E36M3 #514

Tuesday, September 12, 2000 01:09:26

This digest contains the following messages:

#1. Re: Issues at the track - from Paul Elliott
#2. G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? - from Jim Powell
#3. Re: [E36M3] For Sale: 6 Point Harnesses - from Jim Powell
#4. UBERJEPH email address or water pump procedure - from Michael Turgeon
#5. Re: [E36M3] G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? - from Sean Hester
#6. Re: [E36M3] Track Tires, Again... - from b watts
#7. Re: [E36M3] G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? - from Jim Powell
#8. Re: [E36M3] tire/wheel fit question - from LoweSeaton@aol.com
#9. [E36M3] Other Import stories - from Bob Larson
#10. Re: [E36M3] Euro convex mirrors question - from LoweSeaton@aol.com

-------------------- 1 --------------------

#1. Re: Issues at the track - from Paul Elliott
Top
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 23:00:13 -0400 From: "Paul Elliott" <pelliott@rcn.com> Subject: Re: Issues at the track Matt, >Hmm.. I plugged in my dyno numbers and it said to >launch at 3k via clutch dump. It has a lot to do with >which coefficient of friction you plug in for the >tires. And rear end ratio. > That's strange...When I use it, I select the 'Dinan SC '97 M3', and then play with the HP and Torque figures, to see what kind of setup produces various 0-60 times...for instance, to turn a 4.9, you require approx 340 hp. At any rate, if I analyze the launch on this car, it shows a best launch of a clutch dump at approx 1900 rpms? I wonder if were not using different version of the program? Mine is version 4.5. >If your clutch is slipping then it's probably not >worth the extra wear just to get a number. Unless >you're planning on upgrading to a stronger clutch soon >anyway. Well, I really dont think the clutch is in jeopardy, at 18K miles of usually relatively mild driving. And if testing on a hill, and going to 4th or 5th at a lugging speed, I cant get a hint of slip no matter how hard I try. And, I have no trouble spinning the tires in first, or in second with a normal 1-2 shift at above 4K rpms and a quick letout...The only time it slips if if I'm in first at 6K rpms and powershift hard into second...When I let out the clutch, instead of a quick engagement, it just wants to slip to red line. But the fact that it produces a good 0-60 time probably means while it feels like its slipping, in that no quick takeup is evident, may not be...Again, no other method even gives a hint at slippage. Oh well.....When I finally do need a new clutch, maybe I'll try the Sachs Sport clutch. I believe its supposed to be heavy duty, and proably better able to handle the better than 300 crank hp I'm developing. Thanks. _____________________________ Paul Elliott '99 Alpine White M3; <20000 mi; Forged M dbl-spokes; Rotex pads; Dinan Stage II Supercharger; Stygar Short Shift Kit and clutch stop; Skaags pedals -----Original Message----- From: Matt Henson <hensonator@yahoo.com> To: Paul Elliott <pelliott@rcn.com> Cc: E36M3 <e36m3@bmwmpower.com> Date: Sunday, September 10, 2000 11:11 PM Subject: Re: Issues at the track >Hi Paul.. >--- Paul Elliott <pelliott@rcn.com> wrote: >> Matt, >> >> >>I learned most of this by trial and error. >> Once I was armed with a G-tech and cartest it was >> much >> less painful. << >> >> Ah, Cartest! are you referring to the pc program >> which estimates launch >> techniques, and drag times? Ever notice how it says >> to drop clutch at >> somewhere < 2K for the best times? I dont think >> that'll hold up on the >> strip. >> >Hmm.. I plugged in my dyno numbers and it said to >launch at 3k via clutch dump. It has a lot to do with >which coefficient of friction you plug in for the >tires. And rear end ratio. > >> >>You'll >> probably get the best 1/4 mile time with a >> 2900-3200RPM launch, at least with street tires. >> Just >> drop the clutch. If you start to slip the clutch on >> the launch it will usually slip all the way through >> the gear, causing excessive wear and high times. << >> >> Definitely agree here....But let me ask you about >> the most efficient 1 to >> second shift....I seem to have turned my best 0-60 >> times, ie < 5.00 sec, as >> measured by consistant use of the gtech pro by >> powershifting....However, I >> hate the slip....When you even do a 1/4 - 1/2 >> throttle lift powershift, the >> clutch just wants to slip all the way to the rev >> limiter. I'd much rather >> get 3/4 off the gas, do a quick ram into second, and >> get back off the clutch >> asap....It'll sure save the clutch from that >> powershifting stuff, but I have >> a feeling the times will suffer a bit. What do you >> think about that crucial >> shift... >> >If your clutch is slipping then it's probably not >worth the extra wear just to get a number. Unless >you're planning on upgrading to a stronger clutch soon >anyway. Maybe my powershift isn't perfect but I don't >get any clutch slip. Also, if the clutch slips much >you're just putting your power into heating it up. >Not good for times. So if you want to maxamize >longetivity and performance, you probably want to >minimize the clutch slipping. > >But then again I'm the guy who only got a 13.7 with an >AA turbo ;-). > >> thanks. >> _____________________________ >> Paul Elliott >> '99 Alpine White M3; <20000 mi; Forged M dbl-spokes; >> Rotex pads; Dinan Stage >> II Supercharger; Stygar Short Shift Kit and clutch >> stop; Skaags pedals >> >> > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! >http://mail.yahoo.com/ >

Reply to: Paul Elliott

Top

-------------------- 2 --------------------

#2. G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? - from Jim Powell
Top
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 19:58:07 -0700 From: Jim Powell <jsp98m3@home.com> Subject: G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? In this corner we have Gentilozzi or whatever his name is, developing them on Trans Am. ***That might tell you something right there.*** And in our own little corner of the world we had Michael Lord, a very competent driver who dropped lots of money on lots of sets trying to get them figured out. Without success. Tires are like women. Nobody can agree on which one is the best. But it certainly does seem that the G-Force needs something beyond the norm to perform well. Never heard that about the originals. Set the pressure right to avoid the Groove of Doom and they were pretty forgiving. Unless BFG's exclusive target was Trans Am, it seems like they didn't quite come up with the perfect replacement. Jim

Reply to: Jim Powell

Top

-------------------- 3 --------------------

#3. Re: [E36M3] For Sale: 6 Point Harnesses - from Jim Powell
Top
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 19:58:57 -0700 From: Jim Powell <jsp98m3@home.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] For Sale: 6 Point Harnesses Dibs Jim rossb77@juno.com wrote: > > Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 21:59:07 -0500 > From: rossb77@juno.com > Subject: For Sale: 6 Point Harnesses > > 2 Sets of red TRW Sabelt Harness in excellent > condition. E-mail me privately if interested at > RossB77@Juno.com $160.00 for both sets! > > Ross Brown > 95 SC M3 > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you from the mailing list. > *************************************************************

Reply to: Jim Powell

Top

-------------------- 4 --------------------

#4. UBERJEPH email address or water pump procedure - from Michael Turgeon
Top
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 20:17:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Turgeon <turgeon1@yahoo.com> Subject: UBERJEPH email address or water pump procedure Hi Gruppe: Apparently XOOM.com is being intergrated into NBCi.com and the recommended UBERJEPH site is unavailable. I am looking for the water pump change procedure if anyone has his email address or the procedure saved. I know about the 32mm wrench, but pictures are worth a thousand words. Thanks a bunch, Mike Turgeon BMW CCA #166866 95 M3 Avus PS Please respond privately with any large set of instructions. Thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/

Reply to: Michael Turgeon

Top

-------------------- 5 --------------------

#5. Re: [E36M3] G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? - from Sean Hester
Top
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 20:40:41 PDT From: "Sean Hester" <seanh_race@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? >Unless BFG's exclusive target was Trans Am, it seems like >they didn't quite come up with the perfect replacement. actually, i talked to a BFG rep that said their target audience WAS pro racing. (pro racing in general, not just trans am). the kind of users that run 5 laps, come in and take tire temps at three positions, on each tire, with their high dollar pyrometers, make 1/2 (and 1/3) pound pressure adjustments, .05 degree camber adjustments, 1/4 turn on the right front coilver, and go back out for 5 more laps. ad nauseum... sounds like fun when you get 4 sessions all day. (not...) and i'm told that if you do that, g-forces RULE! especially in the heat buildup department, over a 200 mile stint. (another thing that matters ALOT to pro racers, and not to driver school students) apparently we "weekend warriors" don't buy nearly enough tires for them to care about us. (of course he said it in a more politically correct way) _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.

Reply to: Sean Hester

Top

-------------------- 6 --------------------

#6. Re: [E36M3] Track Tires, Again... - from b watts
Top
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 23:54:20 -0400 From: "b watts" <wattba02@wfu.edu> Subject: Re: [E36M3] Track Tires, Again... > i'd recommend g-forces for RACING (if you want to mess with them alot) but > i'd NEVER recommend them for a driver school. OK, I agree with you here. Definitely NOT a tire I would recommend to someone who doesn't have a lot of experience with driving schools. I can understand why instructors might be weary too. I have yet to look into instructing. At this point I am only 20, so walking up to someone and telling them I will be teaching them to drive probably wouldn't set too well. <g> Plus, I'm not so sure I want to get in a car with a student in the first place...I have a LOT of respect for those of you who do. You should see how nervous an instructor who doesn't know me is the first time he gets in the car! <g> I can see why a 20 year old in a race car might be a little scary! \> i DO think that if you spend the time (many months) getting used to g-forces > (meaning set up, like pressures, camber, etc and ALSO learning hhow to drive > them (it's not like every other tire)) then they probably DO perform the > best. at least that's what i've heard. I still don't know how to drive them to their limits, but I am to the point where I can get as much out of them as I did my Hoosiers. I'll explain a little further down why I stick with the BFG's even if they are harder to drive... > your chance of liking any non g-force tire mentioned here is about 99%. > they all rule (compared to street tires). based on the 20 people i know > who have tried g-forces, i'd put your chance of liking g-forces at 5%. that > seems like a pretty big risk to take, spending $800 for a set of tires that > you may hate. Here's the reason...did I mention that I can get a set for $350-$400?? <g> I don't care if they were to wear twice a quick as Hoosiers, I'd still come out on top. > that's never driven anything but street tires, i think you're taking a BIG > chance. both financially (since you may hate them and change to something > else) and physically (since you may total your M3 because they are so > "unfriendly"). Excellent advice...that's why my track car is a wrecked, salvage title 325 and the M3 won't be seeing the track anytime in the near future. Funny story, the car was wrecked in the front and the back, yet when my mechanic started aligning it, he found it to be straighter than the average car from factory. -Bryan Watts

Reply to: b watts

Top

-------------------- 7 --------------------

#7. Re: [E36M3] G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? - from Jim Powell
Top
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 21:17:31 -0700 From: Jim Powell <jsp98m3@home.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? Its kind of a surrealistic outcome isn't it? Why do manufacturers make racing tires? To sell more consumer tires. Then the consumers find they can't run the tire cause they're only mortals. Its almost funny. Jim Sean Hester wrote: > > Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 20:40:41 PDT > From: "Sean Hester" <seanh_race@hotmail.com> > Subject: Re: [E36M3] G-Force, Crap or Crown Jewels? > > >Unless BFG's exclusive target was Trans Am, it seems like > >they didn't quite come up with the perfect replacement. > > actually, i talked to a BFG rep that said their target audience WAS pro > racing. (pro racing in general, not just trans am). the kind of users that > run 5 laps, come in and take tire temps at three positions, on each tire, > with their high dollar pyrometers, make 1/2 (and 1/3) pound pressure > adjustments, .05 degree camber adjustments, 1/4 turn on the right front > coilver, and go back out for 5 more laps. ad nauseum... sounds like fun > when you get 4 sessions all day. (not...) > > and i'm told that if you do that, g-forces RULE! especially in the heat > buildup department, over a 200 mile stint. (another thing that matters ALOT > to pro racers, and not to driver school students) > > apparently we "weekend warriors" don't buy nearly enough tires for them to > care about us. (of course he said it in a more politically correct way) > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you from the mailing list. > *************************************************************

Reply to: Jim Powell

Top

-------------------- 8 --------------------

#8. Re: [E36M3] tire/wheel fit question - from LoweSeaton@aol.com
Top
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 01:28:49 EDT From: LoweSeaton@aol.com Subject: Re: [E36M3] tire/wheel fit question Russell, I run 245/40 tires all around with no problems on my '95 M3. I use BMW rims with a 41 mm offset. I think if you use rims with 41 mm or less offset, you won't have any problems up front. But too little offset and you might get rubbing on the rear fender. I would not recommend using 245/45 tires. They are much taller than the original tires. 245/45 tires are 25.7 inches vs. 245/40 tires which are 24.7 inches tall. That is 1.0 inch taller! That is a lot. You will notice a definite decrease in acceleration. Lowell Seaton '95 M3/2 - currently running 235/45-17 Toyo R-compound tires all around Dallas, Texas

Reply to:

Top

-------------------- 9 --------------------

#9. [E36M3] Other Import stories - from Bob Larson
Top
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 22:52:35 -0700 From: "Bob Larson" <asp9111@home.com> Subject: [E36M3] Other Import stories The Roundel had an article about how we (americans) can import a car if it has special interest... Maybe that's the best way to get headlight washers :) Or >300 factory HP without waiting for E46. Me, I might want an SMG. Maybe I could justify SMG as "special enough" to import individually .... Seems like at least one member has started this, maybe we need more. With the Euro at an all time low, opportunity is there... I'm looking at a used car search engine off of the bmw.de web site. Lots of E36M3 with under 10,000 km and in the 40-50 k EU range... Bob Larson

Reply to: Bob Larson

Top

-------------------- 10 --------------------

#10. Re: [E36M3] Euro convex mirrors question - from LoweSeaton@aol.com
Top
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 02:03:27 EDT From: LoweSeaton@aol.com Subject: Re: [E36M3] Euro convex mirrors question Chester wrote > My new mirrors are quite hot as well. I'm speculating that new mirrors > do this and don't get as hot as time goes by...although it doesn't make > sense. Maybe someone can take a ohm reading? I used to think that the outside mirrors are ALWAYS heated, regardless of the outside temperature. Yep, that's right. Even if it is 100 degrees outside, your mirrors are still heated. However, now I don't know what to think. It has been 100+ for so long in Dallas, I can't tell what is heated or not. And the last time I touched the mirrors when it was below freezing, I did not think the mirrors were heated. I figured something was burned out and my heated mirrors are kaput. Maybe you guys replacing your mirrors have miraculously fixed the heating element? Jiggled a wire so it makes contact again? Are you sure your mirrors weren't heating up before changing the glass? Lowell Seaton '95 M3/2 - no need for heated mirrors in Dallas this year! - 44 days over 100 Dallas, Texas

Reply to:

Top