E36M3 #544

Monday, September 18, 2000 22:45:07

This digest contains the following messages:

#1. Re: LTW Flywheel Install Questions - from Roger Baker
#2. ButtonWillow school opening - from Juan Carlos Bruce-Novoa
#3. Eibach Sway Bar Update - from Rob Buckalew
#4. RE: [E36M3] ZMax Snake Oil or what? - from Matt Henson
#5. Re: [E36M3] ButtonWillow school opening - from Jim Powell
#6. Multiplicative Mixture Adaptation - from sgalaba@ix.netcom.com
#7. [Q] Disposing of Used Brake Fluid - from Ron Buchalski
#8. Re: [E36M3] [Q] Disposing of Used Brake Fluid - from Jason Bishop
#9. HFM screens - from Paul Elliott
#10. Re: [E36M3] HFM screens - from Matt Henson

-------------------- 1 --------------------

#1. Re: LTW Flywheel Install Questions - from Roger Baker
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 17:13:38 -0700 From: Roger Baker <rbaker@velodyne.com> Subject: Re: LTW Flywheel Install Questions The dual mass flywheel's springs & 2 part assembly usually do more for keeping the tranny quiet than damp the crank, although it will have some effect on the crank. Also, the flywheel end of the crank is damped by the load of tranny/drivetrain/vehicle, where the front end is damped only by the harmonic damper & minutely by the belts/accessories. Roger Matt Malfa" <matt@shortshifter.com> wrote: > This has been a recent discussion on the UUC list, within the context of > underdrive pulleys. Although no single consensus was reached, I would sum it > up like this: the springs in the dual-mass flywheel allow it to function as > a second vibration damper, in addition to the one on the front of the > crankshaft. Removal of the dual mass flywheel is kosher, as is removal of > the front vibration damper to install a pulley. Removal of both, however, > will leave nothing to cancel out the 2nd and 3rd order vibrations > experienced by the crankshaft at particualr RPM points. Hence the broken > crank horror stories that have been circulating lately. I don't know of > anyone it has happened to, but the principles are sound. Do one or the > other, not both. > > The TMS LTW flywheel in the Bambislayer is a joy to drive with, especially > the extra scoot off the line. However, the TMS flywheel is lighter than most > (and I can prove it with the increased clatter at idle with the clutch out), > and it has a proportionally larger performance gain, so my experience may > not be the same as an AA owner. > > -Matt

Reply to: Roger Baker

Top

-------------------- 2 --------------------

#2. ButtonWillow school opening - from Juan Carlos Bruce-Novoa
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 17:18:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Juan Carlos Bruce-Novoa <jbruce@stanford.edu> Subject: ButtonWillow school opening Hi all, A friend of mine is signed up for the BMW CCA driving school this weekend at ButtonWillow but he can't make it. If you would like to take his A group slot email him at: allsource@hotmail.com Juan Bruce BMW CCA GGC

Reply to: Juan Carlos Bruce-Novoa

Top

-------------------- 3 --------------------

#3. Eibach Sway Bar Update - from Rob Buckalew
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:35:47 -0400 From: Rob Buckalew <robuc@bellsouth.net> Subject: Eibach Sway Bar Update Hello again everybody, According to Eibach today, these bars will now not be here until the second week of October! I am very sorry for this but unfortunately, my hands are tied until they get the damn things on a boat and get them here. I will hold my offer for the Racing Dynamics bars open if any of you wish to change, otherwise we'll just wait on Eibach. I wish I had better news for all of you waiting on these, but I thought I should let you know this. Thanks, Rob Top Notch Auto Accessories

Reply to: Rob Buckalew

Top

-------------------- 4 --------------------

#4. RE: [E36M3] ZMax Snake Oil or what? - from Matt Henson
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 17:36:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Henson <hensonator@yahoo.com> Subject: RE: [E36M3] ZMax Snake Oil or what? ZMAX is just a high grade mineral oil. Really. Do a search on deja.com. Some guys got them to send their MSDS for OSHA compliance. -Matt --- "Wentz, Don" <don.wentz@intel.com> wrote: > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:17:52 -0700 > From: "Wentz, Don" <don.wentz@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [E36M3] ZMax Snake Oil or what? > > Know nothing of Zmax, but some very famous pilots > swear by AVBlend, > including a close friend who recently retired from > the airlines and flies > his 3 piston powered sport planes a lot. I haven't > used it in my plane yet > but when I get finished fixing the stuck rings in it > (at only 30% of the > recommended overhaul time) I definitely plan to try > it. > dw > 95 M3 > > > Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 01:05:46 -0500 > From: casanova@foreverfun.com > Subject: ZMax Snake Oil or what? > > What's with this new ZMax I see on TV. Apperantly a > product of theirs > called AVBLEND hass FAA approval for airplanes. They > say ZMAX is the > same product for use in cars. HAs anyone tried > either product. What do > you all think. > > Bill P > > > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you > from the mailing list. > ************************************************************* > > > > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you > from the mailing list. > ************************************************************* > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/

Reply to: Matt Henson

Top

-------------------- 5 --------------------

#5. Re: [E36M3] ButtonWillow school opening - from Jim Powell
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 18:54:32 -0700 From: Jim Powell <jsp98m3@home.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] ButtonWillow school opening Bobby and Jonathan, You *have* to be an A group driver ;) Jim <== Help me out here Donna, I don't want Jonathan upset. Damn he's a big guy PS: Ken do you still need help in any way? Happy to sweep up or whatever is needed. Juan Carlos Bruce-Novoa wrote: > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 17:18:34 -0700 (PDT) > From: Juan Carlos Bruce-Novoa <jbruce@stanford.edu> > Subject: ButtonWillow school opening > > Hi all, > > A friend of mine is signed up for the BMW CCA driving school this weekend > at ButtonWillow but he can't make it. If you would like to take his A > group slot email him at: allsource@hotmail.com > > Juan Bruce > BMW CCA GGC > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you from the mailing list. > *************************************************************

Reply to: Jim Powell

Top

-------------------- 6 --------------------

#6. Multiplicative Mixture Adaptation - from sgalaba@ix.netcom.com
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:57:02 -0500 From: sgalaba@ix.netcom.com Subject: Multiplicative Mixture Adaptation Anyone know what it means when the Multiplicative Mixture Adaptation reading has gone 1-3% beyond maximum normal value? Scott Galaba

Reply to:

Top

-------------------- 7 --------------------

#7. [Q] Disposing of Used Brake Fluid - from Ron Buchalski
Top
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 02:16:39 GMT From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com> Subject: [Q] Disposing of Used Brake Fluid With all the recent talk about changing brake fluid, I'm curious to find out what is the recommended way to dispose of used brake fluid. My experience: I took my used brake fluid to the dump along with used motor oil and used antifreeze. They gladly accepted the oil and antifreeze, but had no way to collect the brake fluid. The attendant recommended lining a cardboard box with plastic, filling it with dirt, pouring the brake fluid into the dirt, and sealing the box shut. Yeah, right! I put the used brake fluid into the empty brake fluid containers and disposed of them in the household waste dumpster. I know it's not right, but they left me with no choice. I'd rather have it sitting in the dump than sitting in my garage. What do YOU do? -rb _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.

Reply to: Ron Buchalski

Top

-------------------- 8 --------------------

#8. Re: [E36M3] [Q] Disposing of Used Brake Fluid - from Jason Bishop
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 19:47:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Bishop <jason@secondhat.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] [Q] Disposing of Used Brake Fluid I take mine to the county hazardous waste facility. "Alameda county household hazardous waste collection program" I think its called. They are open 2 weekends a month and you can bring them any crap you can come up with. (although your not supposed to transport more than 15 gallons at a time :) they ask what each one is and then label it and group the stuff. btw, its free. Jason On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Ron Buchalski wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 02:16:39 GMT > From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com> > Subject: [Q] Disposing of Used Brake Fluid > > With all the recent talk about changing brake fluid, I'm curious to find out > what is the recommended way to dispose of used brake fluid. > > My experience: > > I took my used brake fluid to the dump along with used motor oil and used > antifreeze. They gladly accepted the oil and antifreeze, but had no way to > collect the brake fluid. The attendant recommended lining a cardboard box > with plastic, filling it with dirt, pouring the brake fluid into the dirt, > and sealing the box shut. Yeah, right! > > I put the used brake fluid into the empty brake fluid containers and > disposed of them in the household waste dumpster. I know it's not right, > but they left me with no choice. I'd rather have it sitting in the dump > than sitting in my garage. > > What do YOU do? > > -rb > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you from the mailing list. > ************************************************************* > >

Reply to: Jason Bishop

Top

-------------------- 9 --------------------

#9. HFM screens - from Paul Elliott
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 23:15:44 -0400 From: "Paul Elliott" <pelliott@rcn.com> Subject: HFM screens Did anyone read the latest Autospeed article on finding and eliminating negative boost in the intake system? Specifically, he found that by removing the HFM screens, he reduced the intake restrictions he had found by about 20%! I didnt read of the potential negative side effects which must result, except for a mention about the possibility of debris which gets past the filter sneaking into the turbo or engine, and ruining your day. What are some of the real problems with removing them? I've heard that one thing these screens do is to straighten the air...But I've also heard that they add turbulence to the air! I doubt both can be true....For a 20% reduction in negative boost, is it worth it? Thanks. _____________________________ Paul Elliott '99 Alpine White M3; <20000 mi; Forged M dbl-spokes; Rotex pads; Dinan Stage II Supercharger; Stygar Short Shift Kit and clutch stop; Skaags pedals

Reply to: Paul Elliott

Top

-------------------- 10 --------------------

#10. Re: [E36M3] HFM screens - from Matt Henson
Top
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 20:37:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Henson <hensonator@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] HFM screens Paul, Yep.. great service those guys are. I'm gonna measure the intake drops this weekend. I just got my new electronic pressure sensors in :-). The screen that they removed was a little more gnarly than ours is I think. I'll publish the results of my data (of course they will be ampified by the turbo's intake..) -Matt --- Paul Elliott <pelliott@rcn.com> wrote: > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 23:15:44 -0400 > From: "Paul Elliott" <pelliott@rcn.com> > Subject: HFM screens > > Did anyone read the latest Autospeed article on > finding and eliminating > negative boost in the intake system? Specifically, > he found that by > removing the HFM screens, he reduced the intake > restrictions he had found by > about 20%! I didnt read of the potential negative > side effects which must > result, except for a mention about the possibility > of debris which gets past > the filter sneaking into the turbo or engine, and > ruining your day. What > are some of the real problems with removing them? > I've heard that one thing > these screens do is to straighten the air...But I've > also heard that they > add turbulence to the air! I doubt both can be > true....For a 20% reduction > in negative boost, is it worth it? > > Thanks. > _____________________________ > Paul Elliott > '99 Alpine White M3; <20000 mi; Forged M dbl-spokes; > Rotex pads; Dinan Stage > II Supercharger; Stygar Short Shift Kit and clutch > stop; Skaags pedals > > > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you > from the mailing list. > ************************************************************* > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/

Reply to: Matt Henson

Top