E36M3 #644

Friday, October 20, 2000 10:39:11

This digest contains the following messages:

#1. Stock suspension part numbers - from Ted Telesky
#2. RE: [E36M3] Brake vibration? - from Ted Telesky
#3. Re: : E46M3 is a Porker - from Jay Sala
#4. Dealers and E46M3's - from Robert Chay
#5. doh! check engine light - from Kit Wetzler
#6. Re: e46 m3 - on the cover of Autoweek - from albert jenab
#7. Re: [E36M3] E46M3 is a Porker - from Carlos Lopez
#8. Re: [E36M3] SSR Competition 17x8" or 17x8.5" - from Ben Liaw
#9. Re: [E36M3] Dealers and E46M3's - from Peter Guagenti
#10. Experience with ECIS - from Bora Akyol
#11. Stock Suspension Nightmare - from Ted Telesky

-------------------- 1 --------------------

#1. Stock suspension part numbers - from Ted Telesky
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:06:26 -0400 From: Ted Telesky <TTelesky@compuserve.com> Subject: Stock suspension part numbers Does anyone have the stock 1995 M3 part numbers for the front struts and rear shocks? It appears I am in a dispute with a dealer who sold me the wrong stuff. Also, can you tell me the source for the part numbers, as in service manual, etc. Thanks Ted

Reply to: Ted Telesky

Top

-------------------- 2 --------------------

#2. RE: [E36M3] Brake vibration? - from Ted Telesky
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:29:18 -0400 From: Ted Telesky <TTelesky@compuserve.com> Subject: RE: [E36M3] Brake vibration? I just wanted to thank everyone for their emails and suggestions regarding my brake pad questions.... Thanks again, Ted Telesky

Reply to: Ted Telesky

Top

-------------------- 3 --------------------

#3. Re: : E46M3 is a Porker - from Jay Sala
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:24:24 +0800 From: Jay Sala <jsala@mist.com> Subject: Re: : E46M3 is a Porker Hartge (the European tuner) has stuffed the M5's 5.0L V8 in the E46. The performance stats are impressive: 0-100 km/h 4.7 sec 0-200 km/h 15.3 sec 0-1000 m 22.7 sec 4th gear 80-120 km/h: 4.3 sec 5th gear 80-120 km/h: 5.2 sec 6th gear 80-120 km/h: 6.1 sec Max. speed 300 km/h Notice how strong 6th gear acceleration is. You can see more at http://www.hartge.de/english/frameset. <http://www.hartge.de/english/frameset.html> html <http://www.hartge.de/english/frameset.html> There was a review in BMW Car magazine a few months ago. Enjoy! - Jay -------------------- 5 -------------------- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:45:25 -0500 From: "Steven Hazard" <98m3@mediaone.net> Subject: Re: : E46M3 is a Porker ....I'm in NO HURRY to get on a wait list for the E46M3 in it's current dress...Give me the lightweight version with the V-8... Oh I'll pay 10K more, just think 3150 approx lbs with 400 HP.....Now that's a worthy successor to the current car.....

Reply to: Jay Sala

Top

-------------------- 4 --------------------

#4. Dealers and E46M3's - from Robert Chay
Top
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:49:15 -0700 From: "Robert Chay" <rchay@mindspring.com> Subject: Dealers and E46M3's I just went to Long Beach BMW in SoCal to see what their wait list was on this thing. The dickhead salesguy (aren't they all?) has almost no clue. He tells me that there's about 50 people on the list. So I ask about the LTW/GT/whatever. I got the "deer in the headlights" look from him. I said nevermind... have any brochures? Bingo! Got one of those. Now I ask about the price on one of these. DH says he doesn't know but it's definitely going for at least 10k over. WTF?!?! I asked him what BMW NA would think and his response was that they get buyers who buy the car at list and turn around and sells them for 10k over so why shouldn't they profit as well? That's when I walked out on him (brochure in hand). -Bobby '98 M3 '00 or '01 something other than BMW (getting sick of their shit) > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Hazard [mailto:98m3@mediaone.net] > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 7:02 PM > To: E36M3 > Subject: [E36M3] Re: : E46M3 is a Porker > > <snip> > I'm REALLY HOPING FOR A LIMITED RUN OF REAL M3's! > > Regards, > Steve > >

Reply to: Robert Chay

Top

-------------------- 5 --------------------

#5. doh!  check engine light - from Kit Wetzler
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:07:02 -0700 From: "Kit Wetzler" <kitwetzler@mindspring.com> Subject: doh! check engine light Argh. CEL came on tonight while I was driving around. It's probably the old issue of having a cold air intake with stock software. darn. Is there a way to pull codes out of a 97 M3 without resorting to an OBD-2 reading? maybe it's time that I just break down and buy one. :P thanks all! Maybe it's time to give Jim Conforti a call. -kit 97 M3/4 http://www.mindspring.com/~kitwetzler

Reply to: Kit Wetzler

Top

-------------------- 6 --------------------

#6. Re: e46 m3 - on the cover of Autoweek - from albert jenab
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 03:14:31 -0400 From: albert jenab <jenab@his.com> Subject: Re: e46 m3 - on the cover of Autoweek Nice article overall, though that yellow color is awful. Lots of pics. I'd like to see an independent instrumented road test, all I've seen so far is manufacturers claims of 0-60 in 4.8 sec. The other thing they said that I hadn't seen before is the engine will not have hydraulic lifters. This will mean regular valve lash adjustments via shims, not via adjusting rockers like on 2002's and other older BMW engines. Supposedly there will be a system (like the SI lights) which notifies the driver as to when this needs to be done, max every 25K miles. Shades of my old E-type! Wonder how complicated this will be, special tools, etc., and what they'll be charging for Service II's. Hope it doesn't involve pulling the cams. On an old 1.8 L VW GTI I used to own, it required a special set of tools to compress the valve springs and pull the shims, as well as various shim sizes. So you had to pull the valve cover, measure the lash on each valve, remove the shims and mike them, and then go to the dealer and buy the proper size new shim. That was an 8-valve engine, 24 will be interesting. Same on the E-type, though the shims were easier to get at. I guess we'll have euro floating (and now drilled) rotors available at some point through aftermarket sources. The 300 lbs. of extra weight also bothers me. Might be time to put a deposit down on the M3 GT soon. More power, less weight. From the Automobile Magazine road test, there's also this warm-up "feature", that keeps rpms below a certain point (4000 rpm to start) in stages, as the car warms up. So 8000 rpm is not available until either 10 miles, 15 minutes, or 80 deg C oil temp is reached. -Al 95 M3 At 06:02 PM 10/19/00 -0500, "George M. Kofman" <sdg2@execpc.com> wrote: >the new M3 is on the cover of this week's issue of Autoweek. Got it last >night and read it. twice. > >19" wheel option is available in Euro only. BMWNA thinnks that americans >will find the ride to be too harsh on bumpy roads. I guess if you live in >Chi town or Boston :-) > >composite brakes (Euro rotors) not available - Americans will rather >sacrifice a little "non fade" than to put up with the extra noise. makes >total sense to me - who needs friggen brakes anyways ? they just make you go >slow (lol) > >6 sp manual is the only trans choice available. SMG will be available as an >option (My option!) > >the engine is slightly detuned (5-10hp) to accomodate the cat further >upstreat because of DOT regulations. Euro cars have the cat further down >streat. less heat, thus can have more HP. american version has to be >detuned in order not to burn out the cat. > >us version will have cup holders ! > >it's a friggen heavy car - 3400+ # w/o gas. hauls ass though.

Reply to: albert jenab

Top

-------------------- 7 --------------------

#7. Re: [E36M3] E46M3 is a Porker - from Carlos Lopez
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 03:14:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Carlos Lopez <clopez95m3@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] E46M3 is a Porker Sean Hester wrote: >note: in the SCCA ITS class both e36s and e30s race along side each >other. and e36s don't do that much better. IT is regional stuff correct? Are you sure this isn't just a phenomenom in your particular region? From what I hear the E36 *is* superior in ITS over the E30. >i'd expect the same thing in e36/e46 comparisons. Ever catch the World Challenge on TV? The E46 328's seem to be doing much better than the E36 328's. Of course they're from different tuners (t.c.kline vs Turner vs ERT) so that's arguable also. >not to say you shouldn't try it. but it sure looks bad on paper (as a >race car) I agree. Well... let's wait and see. Maybe Bob T. will buy two and run one in Solo II SS and another one in SCCA T1. :-) Carlos Motor City Chapter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/

Reply to: Carlos Lopez

Top

-------------------- 8 --------------------

#8. Re: [E36M3] SSR Competition 17x8" or 17x8.5" - from Ben Liaw
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 07:57:53 -0400 From: "Ben Liaw" <ben@shortshifter.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] SSR Competition 17x8" or 17x8.5" they're not available until spring 2001. there are no fitments for the E36 M3. :-( ben ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Hogg" <springwood@blazenet.net> To: "E36M3" <e36m3@bmwmpower.com> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 11:02 PM Subject: [E36M3] SSR Competition 17x8" or 17x8.5" > Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:17:58 -0700 > From: "David Hogg" <springwood@blazenet.net> > Subject: SSR Competition 17x8" or 17x8.5" > > Does anyone have experience with these forged wheels on an E36 M3? Any > comments about durability or offset/spacers? The suckers only weigh 14.4 > and 15.2 lbs. respectively and cost $359/$369! Hmmmmm... > > Dave Hogg > > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you from the mailing list. > ************************************************************* > >

Reply to: Ben Liaw

Top

-------------------- 9 --------------------

#9. Re: [E36M3] Dealers and E46M3's - from Peter Guagenti
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:10:10 -0700 From: Peter Guagenti <peter@guagenti.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] Dealers and E46M3's ADVICE TO ALL IN CAL: - After you know for sure what car you want to order, go to bmwusa.com. - Do a dealer search in close-by states that don't have tons of idiots willing to spend ungodly amounts of money on basic stuff like rent (Idaho is a good choice). - Call them up and ask for their sales manager. - Tell him/her that you want so-and-so car with so-and-so options and you'd be willing to place the order over the phone and come pick it up with check in hand when it's ready. - Negotiatate a good price. If not, move on to another dealer. - Fly to pick up your car when they have it and enjoy the drive home. I have a friend who just did this and he bought a 540i Sport for $2k under MSRP when all others were quoting him about $1500 over. Dealers all around the country get an allocation too and not all of them are guaranteed to sell. Work it to your advantage and screw the guys who are just milking our loyalty until it's gone and you buy from someone else. -p on 10/20/00 4:42 AM, Robert Chay at rchay@mindspring.com wrote: > I just went to Long Beach BMW in SoCal to see what their wait list was on > this thing. The dickhead salesguy (aren't they all?) has almost no clue. He > tells me that there's about 50 people on the list. So I ask about the > LTW/GT/whatever. I got the "deer in the headlights" look from him. I said > nevermind... have any brochures? Bingo! Got one of those. Now I ask about > the price on one of these. DH says he doesn't know but it's definitely going > for at least 10k over. WTF?!?! I asked him what BMW NA would think and his > response was that they get buyers who buy the car at list and turn around > and sells them for 10k over so why shouldn't they profit as well?

Reply to: Peter Guagenti

Top

-------------------- 10 --------------------

#10. Experience with ECIS  - from Bora Akyol
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:15:42 -0700 From: Bora Akyol <akyol@pluris.com> Subject: Experience with ECIS <take 3> It was brought to my attention that I was too harsh in my evaluation of the ECIS intake. So here is a correction: I had the intake on my car for 4 days now. The results are worth the 3 hours I spent with the install. Let us say that I may have spent 1 hour more than necessary. The shield is still hard to get in there but once it is in, it sounds good and performance esp combined with the J.C. chip is awesome. I will be posting pictures of my install to aid in the installation process as I think the instructions can use an enhancement. And you apparently do not need to remove the charcoal canister bolts with an M3 install. Lucky for me I skipped that step and it fit fine. Bora

Reply to: Bora Akyol

Top

-------------------- 11 --------------------

#11. Stock Suspension Nightmare - from Ted Telesky
Top
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:16:28 -0400 From: Ted Telesky <TTelesky@compuserve.com> Subject: Stock Suspension Nightmare Hi All, I posted a message yesterday about part numbers for the stock 95M3 suspension... I spoke with my mechanic today and it has turned into a real nightmare. Maybe someone here knows enough about the suspension to provide some insight. I ordered all stock struts and shocks for my 95M3 (9/94 build) as I like the stock ride and do 25K miles a year of driving on less than "suspension friendly" LA freeways. The parts came from Nick Alexander BMW. I dropped them off at my mechanic who later called and said the rear shocks were OK but the front struts were wrong. He checked his BMW parts list and the part number was correct, but when he listed the applicable cars for that part number, only 318/325 etc came up. Nick Alexander insisted these were the correct part. I finally called Century West BMW and they gave me another set of part numbers saying the part numbers I had were from the Lux package and I needed the sport package. He also said all Motorsport part number have a "2" in the 5 position from the left - good to know. Anyway, my mechanic has been through 10 sets of struts trying to get one to fit. I am trying to verify that my car was not modified with different springs before I bought it so I have some questions. 1) My mechanic says the strut he needs is made for a smaller diameter spring than the regular 3 series. Is this true, the 95M3 has smaller diameter springs? 2) I was not aware of the 95M3 lux package having a different suspension, is this true. In fact some one told me the lux package was not offered until 96. 3) Again, does anyone know for sure what part numbers are for the front strut. My mechanic finally went to the "warehouse" and by matching my old strut found a match - I have no idea if this is still correct. I am just amazed that BMW can't even agree on this. Thanks for any and all help. Ted

Reply to: Ted Telesky

Top