E36M3 #2377

Sunday, June 16, 2002 08:26:17

This digest contains the following messages:

#1. FS: Embroidered //M3 Floor Mats - from Peter Guagenti
#2. re: RMS short shifter - from Reid Conti
#3. Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen - from Ron Buchalski
#4. Re: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen - from Chester Wong
#5. Re: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen - from Chester Wong
#6. Re: Roundel Autocross Article (shock costs) - from Bob Tunnell
#7. Re: Brake squeal AFTER applying CRC - from Paul Elliott
#8. RE: [E36M3] Re: Roundel Autocross Article (shock costs) - from Andrew-Taylor Autosport
#9. RE: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen - from Carey Probst
#10. Re: [E36M3] Re: Brake squeal AFTER applying CRC - from Jeff A

-------------------- 1 --------------------

#1. FS: Embroidered //M3 Floor Mats - from Peter Guagenti
Top
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 17:43:21 -0700 From: Peter Guagenti <peter@guagenti.com> Subject: FS: Embroidered //M3 Floor Mats Subject line says it all. Mats are factory embroidered and are black. These have been in my '95 for about a year. The only mat that ever really saw any use is the D/S, and the rears have never been in the car. The D/S carpet itself is in excellent condition, but the embroidery could use a good cleaning. First $50 gets it. Buyer pays shipping. -peterg

Reply to: Peter Guagenti

Top

-------------------- 2 --------------------

#2. re: RMS short shifter - from Reid Conti
Top
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 18:23:16 -0700 From: Reid Conti <reid@conti.net> Subject: re: RMS short shifter OK, I have no idea what's going on here. I've looked at UUC's website some more, and I simply don't understand what they're selling, what the different parts are, where they fit, and how it compares with the RMS kit. It looks to me like UUC gives you a UUC shifter rod and parts.. the RMS kit gives you a new carrier, but the shifter rod they give you is just a new stock part. So does UUC shorten throws using a different shifter rod, and the RMS does it by using a different cup to modify the shift point? But then why on earth does UUC show a picture of their shifter with a new carrier as well? They don't seem to sell it.. they just picture it so it looks nice.. so it doesn't seem like I need the UUC rod if I have the RMS piece, because they probably don't work right together.. oh I am beyond confused. I still need a a new cup thingy to hold the ball, but.. ok I just can't think anymore. if anyone has some info that can straighten me out, I'd appreciate it :) - reid > So, lucky me, I ended up with a free RMS short shifter. > > Everyone was pointing out it is basically the UUC short shifter, which is > $295. Upon closer inspection, I found that to be half true. First of all, > the bottom piece (the horizontal one) looks identical to the UUC part. Fair > enough. The upper part, however, is the stock BMW part -- it's the "before" > picture from the UUC website before and after. So it's not height > adjustable, it has the crappier bushing at the bottom, and the plastic > "ball". > > I still need to get a carrier bushing, I think I'll buy UUC's for $25. > > So here's my question -- what's the deal? RMS sells their kit for $395. I > don't see how they get away with selling a half UUC and half BMW kit for > more than UUC charges for a whole kit. Can I buy the UUC height adjustable > upper piece separately? I didn't see it anywhere on their website.. > > Anyway, I guess my question is, what all do I need to make this work? I > plan on buying the UUC carrier for $25, and I know I also need an oval (not > round) bushing for the front of the horizontal piece. Other than that, can > I just install it as-is? Should I get the UUC vertical rod? > > thanks! > > > - reid > > > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you from the mailing list. > DIR - sends a listing of files available in the list's GET directory. > GET filename1.ext,filename2.ext - sends the requested file(s). > > To issue a command/request to the server: > Send a message with the command you wish executed as the > subject of the message to the email address e36m3@bmw-m.net. > ************************************************************* > > ------ End of Forwarded Message

Reply to: Reid Conti

Top

-------------------- 3 --------------------

#3. Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen - from Ron Buchalski
Top
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 02:23:46 +0000 From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com> Subject: Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen Is anyone on the list going to attend this school on June 24-25? I received confirmation this week, so I'll be there. It'll be my first time at this track, although Wayne Miller's videos provided a great overview. -rb _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

Reply to: Ron Buchalski

Top

-------------------- 4 --------------------

#4. Re: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen - from Chester Wong
Top
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:33:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Chester Wong <chester_p_wong@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen =) Hope you enjoyed watching me in one of those videos :) We were stuck behind a train and Wayne's original plan was just to follow me for one lap so I let him by. Unfortunately, Wayne, Jim El Nabli and myself are heading to the Pocono IMSA Long course driver school on June 25th. Apparently, there are quite a few spots left, but there are a few constraints: middle of the week and no beginners. If you don't mind taking the day off and aren't a beginner, go visit the Delaware Chapter website (http://www.delvalbmwcca.org) and think about registering. Chester --- Ron Buchalski <rbuchals@hotmail.com> wrote: > Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 02:23:46 +0000 > From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com> > Subject: Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen > > Is anyone on the list going to attend this school on June 24-25? I received > confirmation this week, so I'll be there. It'll be my first time at this > track, although Wayne Miller's videos provided a great overview. ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/

Reply to: Chester Wong

Top

-------------------- 5 --------------------

#5. Re: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen - from Chester Wong
Top
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:36:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Chester Wong <chester_p_wong@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen BTW, Wayne and I are also doing the 3 day (yes, three days!) at Watkins Glen on July 17 - 19th. That will certainly be a blast...and it's $300 too...so it's cheap, cheap, cheap! Will probably used my Pagid Oranges in my Movit front and rear brakes for the June 25th and July 17-19 schools. =) Chester ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/

Reply to: Chester Wong

Top

-------------------- 6 --------------------

#6. Re: Roundel Autocross Article (shock costs) - from Bob Tunnell
Top
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 21:28:37 -0600 From: Bob Tunnell <bobt@bimmerhaus.com> Subject: Re: Roundel Autocross Article (shock costs) The hottest racer in the Sin City Chapter, Kirk Lachman, writes: >Well, the JRZs aren't cheap, but they aren't the hot set up (HSU) anymore >in stock or street prepared classes anymore. ... Motons are the HSU. JRZ and Moton are very similar in their design because they were both designed by Jerome Van Gool (the "J" in JRZ). Jerome left JRZ to form Moton a few years ago. I've used and sold both and the greatest differences I've found between JRZ and Moton these days are in quality control and factory support and -- trust me -- there is no comparison. >Price? Only about $5400 per set of 4. <gulp> How fast do you want to go? That's about right for a set of top-of-the-line remote reservoir, aluminum body, triple-adjustable Motons for an E46 (E36 are slightly less). But non remote single-adjustables are "only" about $2800. And that's before any BMW CCA discount. <g> The biggest advantage with Motons over most Konis or Bilsteins is the *huge* valving, which provides a tremendous range of adjustment. The primary bump adjustment is 14 clicks and the rebound is 16 clicks -- and each click is noticeable. Yes, they're very streetable on their softer settings. I've driven cross-country 5-6 times in the very car featured in the Roundel article and haven't lost a filling yet. <g> --Bob

Reply to: Bob Tunnell

Top

-------------------- 7 --------------------

#7. Re: Brake squeal AFTER applying CRC - from Paul Elliott
Top
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 00:52:29 -0400 From: "Paul Elliott" <elliott.paul@worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: Brake squeal AFTER applying CRC Jeff, Havent you guys had any luck with the hi temp silicone grease? Ive used this exclusively and have never had any kind of squeel after its application..This is even true on the infamously noisey Repco Deluxe pads years ago. Ive used it many times on many different pads and cars, and have never had any noise from it..I tried the CRC orange stuff once, and hated it so much I went right back to the silicon grease. And, the CRC made noise...the grease didnt. For the track I would think this would be the ideal solution. Paul Elliott --------------------------------------------------------- '99 White M3; < 45K miles; Dinan stage II SC kit with 6" RMS crank pulley: 11 psi; AA Water Injection; Fikse FM-10s; X-Brace; Dinan Koni Suspension; Stygar SS and Clutch Stop; Sound by Polk, Excelon, JLAudio

Reply to: Paul Elliott

Top

-------------------- 8 --------------------

#8. RE: [E36M3] Re: Roundel Autocross Article (shock costs) - from Andrew-Taylor Autosport
Top
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 03:50:14 -0400 From: "Andrew-Taylor Autosport" <astaylor@taylorautosport.com> Subject: RE: [E36M3] Re: Roundel Autocross Article (shock costs) Don't forget Ohlins (which I use (triples in front...4-ways in back)) which are undoubtedly the best damper technology going right now (from 4 years in a row CART champion, the Audi R8, to Trans-Am championships and The Racer's Group Porsches)...also out there which are very good dampers are Dynamic Suspension and Penske. If you are going to spend $$$$ on dampers, then the three above are really cream of the crop (what the real pros use...)...however, there aren't any bolt-ons for BMWs so you gotta make 'em work (like fabricating front struts and making your own rear shock towers). The really cool thing is (like Bilsteins) the front inserts of the above three, are inverted for cooling, so they stay on. That said, Motons are really nice and you can get a car to do what you want it to more than other options not mentioned, and the older JRZs are too. Speaking of...a friend of mine has a complete set of JRZ doubles (one weekend on them since a factory rebuild) for an E36 for sale right now for $3600 if anyone is interested... Shocks are everything...well, maybe downforce comes before shocks...tough call, ehh? Andrew > > Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 21:28:37 -0600 > From: Bob Tunnell <bobt@bimmerhaus.com> > Subject: Re: Roundel Autocross Article (shock costs) > > The hottest racer in the Sin City Chapter, Kirk Lachman, writes: > > >Well, the JRZs aren't cheap, but they aren't the hot set up (HSU) > anymore > >in stock or street prepared classes anymore. ... Motons are the HSU. > > JRZ and Moton are very similar in their design because they were both > designed by Jerome Van Gool (the "J" in JRZ). Jerome left JRZ to form > Moton a few years ago. > > I've used and sold both and the greatest differences I've found between > JRZ and Moton these days are in quality control and factory support and > -- trust me -- there is no comparison. > > >Price? Only about $5400 per set of 4. <gulp> How fast do you want to > go? > > That's about right for a set of top-of-the-line remote reservoir, > aluminum body, triple-adjustable Motons for an E46 (E36 are slightly > less). But non remote single-adjustables are "only" about $2800. And > that's before any BMW CCA discount. <g> > > The biggest advantage with Motons over most Konis or Bilsteins is the > *huge* valving, which provides a tremendous range of adjustment. The > primary bump adjustment is 14 clicks and the rebound is 16 clicks -- and > each click is noticeable. > > Yes, they're very streetable on their softer settings. I've driven > cross-country 5-6 times in the very car featured in the Roundel article > and haven't lost a filling yet. <g> > > --Bob > > > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you from the mailing list. > DIR - sends a listing of files available in the list's GET directory. > GET filename1.ext,filename2.ext - sends the requested file(s). > > To issue a command/request to the server: > Send a message with the command you wish executed as the > subject of the message to the email address e36m3@bmw-m.net. > ************************************************************* > > > >

Reply to: Andrew-Taylor Autosport

Top

-------------------- 9 --------------------

#9. RE: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen - from Carey Probst
Top
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 09:09:48 -0400 From: "Carey Probst" <hcprobst@alum.mit.edu> Subject: RE: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen Had planned to until Patroon outlawed 4 point harnesses. The Glen is a great track to run, 2 long straights plus some very interesting corners. Fortunately, Genesee Valley hasn't restricted belts so I'll continue to run with them there. Carey Probst, '99 M3/2, BMW CCA Patroon and Genesee Valley Chapters Sharked, Stressed, Schrothed, Gauged, Hitched, X-Braced A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ron Buchalski [mailto:rbuchals@hotmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 10:25 PM > To: E36M3 > Subject: [E36M3] Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen > > > Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 02:23:46 +0000 > From: "Ron Buchalski" <rbuchals@hotmail.com> > Subject: Patroon Chapter School @ Watkins Glen > > Is anyone on the list going to attend this school on June 24-25? > I received > confirmation this week, so I'll be there. It'll be my first time at this > track, although Wayne Miller's videos provided a great overview. > > -rb > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. > > > > ************************************************************* > List Commands > UNSUBSCRIBE - (in subject line) unsubscribes you from the mailing list. > DIR - sends a listing of files available in the list's GET directory. > GET filename1.ext,filename2.ext - sends the requested file(s). > > To issue a command/request to the server: > Send a message with the command you wish executed as the > subject of the message to the email address e36m3@bmw-m.net. > ************************************************************* > > >

Reply to: Carey Probst

Top

-------------------- 10 --------------------

#10. Re: [E36M3] Re: Brake squeal AFTER applying CRC - from Jeff A
Top
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 08:15:45 -0500 From: "Jeff A" <aabel@austin.rr.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] Re: Brake squeal AFTER applying CRC Paul, I'll give it a shot. It seems that high temp silicone may be easier to pull off than the ever-tacky red goop from CRC. Thanks for the tip. If I weren't so lazy, I'd try it right now but I'll just wait till my next track day. I'll let everyone know how it works out. Jeff > Jeff, > > Havent you guys had any luck with the hi temp silicone grease? Ive used > this exclusively and have never had any kind of squeel after its > application..This is even true on the infamously noisey Repco Deluxe pads > years ago. Ive used it many times on many different pads and cars, and have > never had any noise from it..I tried the CRC orange stuff once, and hated it > so much I went right back to the silicon grease. And, the CRC made > noise...the grease didnt. For the track I would think this would be the > ideal solution. > > Paul Elliott

Reply to: Jeff A

Top