E36M3 #4866

Thursday, July 13, 2006 09:36:32

This digest contains the following messages:

#1. RE: [E36M3] FS: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s - from Ahmad Lutfeali
#2. WTB: Stock S50 Chip - from Nancy and Bob Fluharty
#3. Software - AA vs. Shark v s. Dinan vs...... - from Kent Shephard
#4. Re: [E36M3] Software - AA vs. Shark v s. Dinan vs...... - from Jim Bassett
#5. FS: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s - from dhogg
#6. 3.2 Long Block FS - from Richard Sperry
#7. RE: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s - from Ahmad Lutfeali
#8. [E36M3] FS - Hot Lap timer - from Jay Hudson
#9. Quick question: ARLCA -- legal in BSP? - from mdriver13@aol.com
#10. Re: [E36M3] Quick question: ARLCA -- legal in BSP? - from m.feldpusch@comcast.net

-------------------- 1 --------------------

#1. RE: [E36M3] FS: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s - from Ahmad Lutfeali
Top
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:14:54 -0400 From: "Ahmad Lutfeali" <m3_racer99@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: [E36M3] FS: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s Caffeine eliminated the fog here. Yes 235/40/17s. Sorry about that. Ahmad -----Original Message----- From: twisty M3 [mailto:twistym3@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:12 PM To: m3_racer99@hotmail.com; e36m3@bmw-m.net Subject: RE: [E36M3] FS: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s I'm assuming that's a typo and that you mean 235/40-17? Jonathan L.

Reply to: Ahmad Lutfeali

Top

-------------------- 2 --------------------

#2. WTB: Stock S50 Chip - from Nancy and Bob Fluharty
Top
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:27:08 -0400 From: "Nancy and Bob Fluharty" <fluhar@worldnet.att.net> Subject: WTB: Stock S50 Chip I can't help you guys with your obsoleted mufflers, but if you've sharked your DME, I'd like your stock chip. Must be early '95 (pre-EWS II) from the 402 DME, chip part number 1267 357 965. Send me a price. Bob Fluharty Cincinnati 87 325is/3.0

Reply to: Nancy and Bob Fluharty

Top

-------------------- 3 --------------------

#3. Software - AA vs. Shark v s. Dinan vs...... - from Kent Shephard
Top
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:38:19 -0700 From: Kent Shephard <Kents@kls-consulting.com> Subject: Software - AA vs. Shark v s. Dinan vs...... Okay the tile says it all. Money out of the equation what makes sense to purchase for a '97? I'm familiar with JC because that's what I had in my E30. I know the shark allows me to do it at home vs. sending in my DME. THe question is for a car with UUC Exhaust, CAI, and some other minor mods; which to buy? Kent Shephard kents@kshephard.com

Reply to: Kent Shephard

Top

-------------------- 4 --------------------

#4. Re: [E36M3] Software - AA vs. Shark v s. Dinan vs...... - from Jim Bassett
Top
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:47:22 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Bassett" <jim@jimbassett.com> Subject: Re: [E36M3] Software - AA vs. Shark v s. Dinan vs...... On Wed, July 12, 2006 2:42 pm, Kent Shephard said: > Okay the tile says it all. > Money out of the equation what makes sense to purchase for a '97? JimC, from this list sponsor: > ************************************************* > Please help support the E36M3 list by visiting our sponsors: > > Eurosport High Performance http://www.eurosporthighperformance.com Jim Bassett - just spoke to Josh today, as a matter of fact 1998 M3/4 - Sharked 1992 325is #44 JP - Ditto :-)

Reply to: Jim Bassett

Top

-------------------- 5 --------------------

#5. FS: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s - from dhogg
Top
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 21:27:15 -0400 From: "dhogg" <dhogg@suscom.net> Subject: FS: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s Ahmad, Does this mean you're going to dis the RA-1's for racing? Please stay with them. I'm very old and I need all the help I can get. Dave Hogg

Reply to: dhogg

Top

-------------------- 6 --------------------

#6. 3.2 Long Block FS - from Richard Sperry
Top
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:16:38 -0400 From: "Richard Sperry" <richardsperry@comcast.net> Subject: 3.2 Long Block FS From: "John Mariani" <john@bavarianperformancegroup.com> To: <club-racing-list@bimmers.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:24 AM Subject: [CR] 97 3.2 Long Block FS > Hey gang, > > Have a 3.2 long block out of a 97 M3, engine has approx 120k. When it > came out of the car the engine was running strong and recently dyno'ed at > 224 whp and 224 tq SAE corrected on a dynojet. Can supply it with an oil > pan, and intake manifolds if needed. > > Asking $3300 OBO. > > - John Mariani So how much would it take to rebuild this motor? Assume valve job, seals, check the rings and bearings, head studs, and thicker head gasket. Turn that thing into a 3.2l supercharged, obd1 motor. Say another $4K...

Reply to: Richard Sperry

Top

-------------------- 7 --------------------

#7. RE: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s - from Ahmad Lutfeali
Top
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:29:55 -0400 From: "Ahmad Lutfeali" <m3_racer99@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s Dave, You took away one night's worth of sleep from me when you mentioned you were going to run Hoosiers (shame on you). Looking forward to the race in 2 weeks ;) A.L. _____ From: dhogg [mailto:dhogg@suscom.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 9:27 PM To: m3_racer99@hotmail.com; 'E36M3' Subject: FS: 245/40/17 Toyo RA1s Ahmad, Does this mean you're going to dis the RA-1's for racing? Please stay with them. I'm very old and I need all the help I can get. Dave Hogg

Reply to: Ahmad Lutfeali

Top

-------------------- 8 --------------------

#8. [E36M3] FS - Hot Lap timer - from Jay Hudson
Top
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 06:48:04 -0700 From: "Jay Hudson" <jwhud@budget.net> Subject: [E36M3] FS - Hot Lap timer Model 21708. Does not include trackside transmitter. This is the system with the smaller sized display unit. Like new. Little use. Perfect. $135, shipped to lower 48. I can deliver to CCA race at T-hill in Aug for $125. jwhud@budget.net or call me at work 541-776-2344, wed-sat, 9-5:30pt Jay

Reply to: Jay Hudson

Top

-------------------- 9 --------------------

#9. Quick question: ARLCA -- legal in BSP? - from mdriver13@aol.com
Top
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:16:09 -0400 From: mdriver13@aol.com Subject: Quick question: ARLCA -- legal in BSP? Group, I thought I'd defer to those who know. Is it legal to use the adjustable rear lower control arms in BSP? If so, can you use the type with the spherical bushings, or do you have to stay with the rubber bushing? Bob Gill 97 ///M3 coupe (sponsored by WCC & JT-Designs) Philly Region SCCA 2005 Philly Region BSP Champion ________________________________________________________________________ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free.

Reply to:

Top

-------------------- 10 --------------------

#10. Re: [E36M3] Quick question: ARLCA -- legal in BSP? - from m.feldpusch@comcast.net
Top
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:34:30 +0000 From: m.feldpusch@comcast.net Subject: Re: [E36M3] Quick question: ARLCA -- legal in BSP? Morning Aftermarket control arms puts you in SM. Then no need to worry about the spherical bushings. :) Michael -------------- Original message -------------- From: mdriver13@aol.com > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:16:09 -0400 > From: mdriver13@aol.com > Subject: Quick question: ARLCA -- legal in BSP? > > Group, > > I thought I'd defer to those who know. Is it legal to use the adjustable rear > lower control arms in BSP? If so, can you use the type with the spherical > bushings, or do you have to stay with the rubber bushing? > > Bob Gill > 97 ///M3 coupe (sponsored by WCC & JT-Designs) > Philly Region SCCA > 2005 Philly Region BSP Champion > ________________________________________________________________________ > Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. > All on demand. Always Free. > > > ************************************************* > Please help support the E36M3 list by visiting our sponsors: > > Bimmerworld http://www.bimmerworld.com > Turner Motorsport http://www.turnermotorsport.com > Eurosport High Performance http://www.eurosporthighperformance.com > Rogue Engineering http://www.rogueengineering.com > Treehouse Racing http://www.treehouseracing.com > Elephant Motorsports Inc. http://www.elephantmotorsports.com > > DIGEST INFORMATION: > http://www.bmw-m.net/resources/digest_info.htm > ************************************************* > >

Reply to:

Top